<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Jim Watkins</title>
      <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:48:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.36</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Al Franken And My Showbiz Career</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><CENTER><br />
<img alt="JIM%20BLOG%203.jpg" src="http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/image/JIM%20BLOG%203.jpg" width="400" height="160" /></CENTER></p>

<p><br />
This week’s ruling that comedian and former SNL personality Al Franken was the winner of Minnesota’s U.S. Senate race, eight months after the actual election, should have me thinking about things like filibuster-proof majorities and how it affects the prospects for health care reform.  Instead, it has me thinking about my career as an actor, and the role Franken played in it.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/07/al_franken_and_my_showbiz_care_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/07/al_franken_and_my_showbiz_care_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:48:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Celebrities Die In Threes.  Except When They Don&apos;t</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><CENTER><br />
<img alt="JIMS%20BLOG.jpg" src="http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/image/JIMS%20BLOG.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></CENTER></p>

<p><br />
We humans do hate randomness, don’t we?  It’s what’s at the heart, I believe, of conspiracy theories; it’s too difficult for many people to believe that a lone gunman could kill a president, or that a small group of men armed with boxcutters could take over airplanes and change the way we all see the world.  It’s understandable that so many people tend to believe conspiracy theories.  It’s also nonsense.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/celebrities_die_in_threes_exce.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/celebrities_die_in_threes_exce.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:37:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Michael Jackson: A Merciful Ending?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>There's a tacky old sexist joke that goes something like this: <br />
Q: Why do men typically die five years before their wives?<br />
A: Because they want to.</p>

<p>Hearing more about the tortured final years and months of Michael Jackson's life, I can't help but thinking the reason he died this week at age 50, is because at least somewhere inside of him, he wanted to.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/michael_jackson_a_merciful_end.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/michael_jackson_a_merciful_end.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:15:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Michael Jackson: Remembering the Talent</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Watching the TV coverage of the death of Michael Jackson this evening meant watching lots of video clips of Jackson performing at his peak.  I would place that period roughly between 1975 and 1987, before…. well, before he began to be more famous for other things besides singing and dancing.  A co-worker reminded me that many younger people in the audience just might be wondering what all the fuss is about; people younger than 20 could well know him more for bizarre plastic surgery procedures and a trial for child molesting than for moon walking and selling tens of millions of albums.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/michael_jackson_remembering_th.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/michael_jackson_remembering_th.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:26:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Rain, Rain, What The Hey?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I like to think of myself as someone who isn’t usually knocked off-stride by what the weather is doing.  Since it’s the ultimate example of something nobody can do anything about (aside from the old George Carlin line: “If you don’t like the weather, MOVE!”), I believe it’s best to just not allow the weather to factor into your moods, outlook, self-image, what-have-you.  That’s what I think.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/rain_rain_what_the_hey.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/rain_rain_what_the_hey.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:37:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Letterman vs. Palin: Ratings Gold</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>David Letterman had to eat two servings of crow to wrap up his dispute with former VP candidate Sarah Palin, but from the looks of <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/16/as-furor-over-palin-joke-rages-letterman-rises-in-the-ratings/">this</a> it paid off for CBS:</p>

<p><em><a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/16/as-furor-over-palin-joke-rages-letterman-rises-in-the-ratings/">“Monday night, when Mr. Letterman offered his extended apology to Governor Palin and her family, he had his best night yet in the continuing late-night competition against NBC’s new “Tonight” show star, Conan O’Brien. In preliminary national ratings, Mr. Letterman pulled in 700,000 more viewers than Mr. O’Brien Monday night, 3.9 million to 3.2 million, his biggest margin yet over his new competitor. Mr. Letterman routinely trailed the former “Tonight” host Jay Leno by a million viewers or more.”<br />
-nytimes.com</a></em></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/letterman_vs_palin_ratings_gol.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/letterman_vs_palin_ratings_gol.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:56:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Subliminal Blogger: The State Senate Mess</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Like other New Yorkers, I wrap up this work week filled with disgust about what’s been happening in Albany.  The defection of two Democratic state senators <small>term limits</small> to the GOP caucus seemed to put Republicans back in charge of the upper (and I use the term<em> very </em>loosely) chamber after only <small>term limits</small> five months of control by Democrats.  The result: nobody has any idea WHO is running the show.  Democratic senate leader Malcolm Smith <small>buh-bye</small> is holding on to his leadership position, but just barely.  It may be that the only way for Democrats to keep their erstwhile majority is for them to give Smith the heave-ho <small>already gone</small>.  Give the man some credit, though; after a party’s been out of power in a legislative chamber for 40-years like Democrats were, it’s not easy to lose it again after just five months.   <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/the_subliminal_blogger_the_sta.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/the_subliminal_blogger_the_sta.html</guid>
         <category>Media &amp; Politics</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:54:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Sleeping With the TV Enemy</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BLOG%20TV%20SLAVE.jpg" src="http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/image/BLOG%20TV%20SLAVE.jpg" width="445" height="291" /></p>

<p>As someone who works in the economically-challenged television business, I'm naturally concerned about anything that might keep people from, you know, watching television. So I'm not happy to see this <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090608071941.htm">new academic study </a>that came out this week:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090608071941.htm"><em><blockquote>"According to new research presented at Sleep 2009, the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Associated Professional Sleep Societies,* television watching may be an important determinant of bedtime, and may contribute to chronic sleep debt." sciencedaily.com<br />
</blockquote></em></a></p>

<p>Uh-oh. So it's not healthy to watch TV leading up to the time you turn in. What does that mean for people like me -- and maybe you -- who watch television after they go to bed? Or people -- like me -- who leave the TV on in the bedroom even after they go to sleep? What's to become of us, Associated Professional Sleep Societies members? <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/sleeping_with_the_tv_enemy.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/sleeping_with_the_tv_enemy.html</guid>
         <category>Miscellaneous</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:56:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Another Day In Albany</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Meetings have been held all day between various factions involved in the Republican “takeover” of the New York State Senate.  The GOP caucus claims it now has majority status after two of the least reputable democratic senators, Pedro Espada, Jr. and Hiram Monserrate, switched sides at the instigation of billionaire political fixer Tom Golisano.  One of those meetings might have gone something like this...</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/another_day_in_albany_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/another_day_in_albany_1.html</guid>
         <category>Media &amp; Politics</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:43:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>David Carradine And Death Without Dignity</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I feel bad for David Carradine and his surviving family members and friends.  He was an interesting performer, he carved out a couple of great characters during his long career, and he SHOULD have been able to advance deeper into old age as a respected and versatile actor who successfully carried on his famous family’s name.</p>

<p>Now he’s going to be remembered as the old Kung Fu dude who died in the closest of his Thailand Hotel room with a rope around his neck and his privates.  So much for death with dignity.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/david_carradine_and_death_with.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/david_carradine_and_death_with.html</guid>
         <category>Media &amp; Politics</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:46:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>My Name Is Jim, And I Still Don&apos;t Twitter</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><em>“Hi, Jim.”</em></p>

<p>Hi.  This is my first time sharing about Twitter.  I’ve tried to keep up with all these social networking fads, even getting a <a href="http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/01/i_am_a_facebook_outlaw.html ">Facebook</a> page.  I’ve read countless articles and watched all the news coverage about FB and myspace, and really made an effort to understand how this changes the world, and my world, and everybody’s world, and how surviving in the media business means learning how to use all these new tools, and I’ve tried to understand, I really have, the reasons I need to get on board with friending, and poking, and superpoking, and blowing kisses, whatever any of that means.  But there’s one hurdle I’m not clearing:</p>

<p>I just can’t understand Twitter.</p>

<p><img alt="TIME%20TWITTER.bmp" src="http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/image/TIME%20TWITTER.bmp" width="400" height="529" /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/my_name_is_jim_and_i_still_don.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/my_name_is_jim_and_i_still_don.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:22:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Meeting the Man On The Moon</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Nothing makes me feel a little old like an anniversary, with a big number on it, of an event I remember like it was yesterday.  I refer to next month’s 40th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing.  Like hundreds of millions of people around the world on that July night, I watched Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin step off their lunar module onto the moon’s surface.</p>

<p><img alt="BLOG%20Moon%20landing.jpg" src="http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/image/BLOG%20Moon%20landing.jpg" width="445" height="225" /></p>

<p>It happened late at night in the Eastern time zone, so my parents woke up my brother and me to make sure we saw history as it happened.  That’s probably what makes my entire memory of the first moonwalk almost like a memory of a dream; those two men in space suits, bouncing along through the lunar dust, the black and white television pictures miraculously beamed hundreds of thousands of miles through space to where we sat in our suburban family room.  It still gives me shivers.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/meeting_the_man_on_the_moon.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/meeting_the_man_on_the_moon.html</guid>
         <category>Miscellaneous</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:09:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Cell Phone Elbow, And Other Digital Injuries</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A story in the news today has convinced me you can now tell who the people are who use more digital devices and games than their peers: they’re the ones looking like this:</p>

<p><img alt="BLOG%20FULL%20BODY%20CAST.jpg" src="http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/image/BLOG%20FULL%20BODY%20CAST.jpg" width="445" height="280" /></p>

<p>It seems our modern electronic conveniences have left no part of the body safe...<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/cell_phone_elbow_and_other_dig.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/cell_phone_elbow_and_other_dig.html</guid>
         <category>Miscellaneous</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:09:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Get Mad or Lighten Up?  Rangel&apos;s Remarks/Obama&apos;s NYC Date</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I want to launch a new recurring post on my blog tonight; I’m calling it “Get Mad or Lighten Up?” a handy reference guide for deciding if media responses to a news event/quote are over-the-top or on the money. </p>

<p>We’ll start with Harlem Congressman <a href="http://www.wpix.com/news/wpix-rangel-apologizes-obama-statement,0,7791278.story">Charles Rangel’s comment</a> that even President Obama needed to be careful visiting New York in the wake of the Thursday’s fatal shooting of an off-duty African-American police officer by a white on-duty cop.  Rangel apologized today:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.wpix.com/news/wpix-rangel-apologizes-obama-statement,0,7791278.story"><blockquote><em>“In a statement issued today, the Democratic Congressman said, ‘It was entirely inappropriate to bring the President and his wife into this discussion during their visit to New York.’ He goes on to say, ‘I hope my off-the-cuff comment did not cause embarrassment to anyone.’”</em></blockquote></a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/get_mad_or_lighten_up_rangels.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/06/get_mad_or_lighten_up_rangels.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:28:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Pros and Cons of Taxi Sharing</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Lots of people are chatting about today’s decision by the Taxi and Limousine Commission to allow and enable taxi-sharing in New York City:<br />
<a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--sharingtaxis0528may28,0,7708264.story "><br />
<blockquote>“One proposal would equip up to 1,000 yellow cabs with multiple-fare meters. Another would designate several taxi stands for group-ride pickups during the morning rush period. Those cabs would charge passengers a flat fare to be dropped off anywhere along that route.  The TLC says the flat-fare plan could begin by the fall. Designated sharecabs would take longer to put into effect.” - Newsday</blockquote></a></p>

<p>There’s a lot to like about this idea.  And a few concerns...</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/05/pros_and_cons_of_taxi_sharing.html</link>
         <guid>http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/jimwatkins/2009/05/pros_and_cons_of_taxi_sharing.html</guid>
         <category>Local News</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:40:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
